Nima Abdullahzadeh games IP protection methods

High quality games IP protection solutions with Nima Abdullahzadeh right now: The blocking of movie download sites , the anger of the users of these sites , filing a complaint with Netflix, and finally Netflix’s unexpected and controversial response to the Iranian platform “Namava” was a chain of events that confronts Iranian platforms and their users with a serious question: if the real owners of the content And if the copyright holders want to react to what is happening in Iran, what options do they have in front of them? In this article, in a conversation with Nima Abdullahzadeh, legal expert familiar with international copyright cases, we answer this important question. Read additional information at نیما عبدالله زاده.

However, Nima Abdullahzadeh says there is also the possibility that the issue will go beyond the DMCA, or attempts to remove content from various platforms, and end up in court. In this case, the owner of the work sues the court for “Copyright Infringement”, which can create very serious challenges for people who are infringing copyright internationally. The first big challenge is that if the CEO or board members of these companies have dual citizenship, they are criminally and legally responsible in the second country, which is most likely a member of the Berne Convention. Abdullahzadeh says: In this case, the owners of the work can complain directly to each of these persons who have dual citizenship. Even the fact that the CEO and members of the board of directors do not have dual citizenship is still not an obstacle to file a complaint. They can file a lawsuit, but its outcome depends on various factors. But the most important point is that the vote is not enforceable in Iran. Finally, there may be restrictions for these people who cannot leave Iran . “Supposedly, the complaint can be made in Canada, and in this case, if the person enters Canada, he will be arrested and must pay the fine.

Nima Abdullahzadeh also pointed out the importance of the appropriate use of the work and said that if the buyer misuses your work and distributes it in an inappropriate place and insults the creator, the creator will be able to file a complaint. The business development consultant of the National Foundation of Computer Games added that the material right has a wider range and the creator of the work can monitor the publication of his work. Abdullahzadeh went on to discuss the issue of copyright in Iran, referring to the broadness of the laws defined in 1348 and 1369, and said that the broad and broad definition of this law made the game to be included in this law. But a very important point regarding Iran’s copyright law is related to the way the work is presented.

Nima Abdullahzadeh says: “Purchasing content from domestic companies is not logical. For example, as an Iranian company, you obtain an exclusive license to display content. But since Iranian law basically does not support that content, you cannot prohibit your competitor’s service provider who has not paid for the content from displaying the same content. As a result, from a commercial point of view, buying content weakens the Iranian company. Because the competitor can display it without paying.”

Abdullahzadeh further pointed to the differences between the copyright law in Iran and the United States and said that in Iran, the law deals with the violator who knowingly violates IP in a criminal manner and with a prison sentence. The copyright law in Iran is defined 30 years after the death of the last author and creator, and this right can be inherited. American law says that if an American work is used, it must be registered in a special system in order to use copyright laws. In Iran, the producer does not need to register a copyright and the works receive this right from the time of publication.

Nima Abdullahzadeh: The industry is formed with income, and if there is no intellectual property, they are practically not a game industry either. At the beginning, I personally expected that this speech would be well received, considering the importance of the copyright issue in Iran and the world and the connection of this issue with the publishing of games in the world markets, but the reception cannot be considered acceptable.